<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: £69k worth of Lingerie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.generally-speaking.com/69k-worth-of-lingerie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.generally-speaking.com/69k-worth-of-lingerie/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:00:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Transvetite In £120k Lingerie Robbery!</title>
		<link>http://www.generally-speaking.com/69k-worth-of-lingerie/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Transvetite In £120k Lingerie Robbery!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.generally-speaking.com/?p=37#comment-67</guid>
		<description>[...] of lingerie stolen from Marks and Spencer worth nearly £120,000. That&#8217;s more than the £69k worth of stolen lingerie stolen by the charity worker a few months [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of lingerie stolen from Marks and Spencer worth nearly £120,000. That&#8217;s more than the £69k worth of stolen lingerie stolen by the charity worker a few months [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Awesome</title>
		<link>http://www.generally-speaking.com/69k-worth-of-lingerie/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Awesome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 08:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.generally-speaking.com/?p=37#comment-15</guid>
		<description>aah glad you cleared that up, now at least we know she isnt wearing gold encrusted knickers! must just be diamanté.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aah glad you cleared that up, now at least we know she isnt wearing gold encrusted knickers! must just be diamanté.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diane parry</title>
		<link>http://www.generally-speaking.com/69k-worth-of-lingerie/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>diane parry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 05:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.generally-speaking.com/?p=37#comment-14</guid>
		<description>It would seem to me the obvious answer is NO &amp; the the operative word would be alleged ... as much as lurid trumped stories fascinate the public , wouldn&#039;t you research the topic a little before you make judgements ????? Yellow journalism exists everywhere, my friend, you Brits should certainly know that. Those closer to the subject know the truth will be revealed soon enough. Enuff said !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would seem to me the obvious answer is NO &amp; the the operative word would be alleged &#8230; as much as lurid trumped stories fascinate the public , wouldn&#8217;t you research the topic a little before you make judgements ????? Yellow journalism exists everywhere, my friend, you Brits should certainly know that. Those closer to the subject know the truth will be revealed soon enough. Enuff said !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

